We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data. We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.

Advertisement

Aquaponics vs Hydroponics

Simplified illustration of an aquaponics system versus a hydroponics system.
Credit: Technology Networks
Listen with
Speechify
0:00
Register for free to listen to this article
Thank you. Listen to this article using the player above.

Want to listen to this article for FREE?

Complete the form below to unlock access to ALL audio articles.

Read time: 16 minutes

Hydroponics and aquaponics are both soilless farming techniques that utilize artificial systems to sustain and optimize crop growth.1,2  Systems may be large or small and can produce either edible or ornamental plants.1,2,3,4 Both are expected to play a significant role in the future of sustainable agriculture as food chain demands continue to increase.5




This article highlights the key differences between hydroponic and aquaponic growing systems, their current applications and future perspectives on their role in sustainable farming.


What is hydroponics?

The term “hydroponics” refers to the science of growing plants in an aqueous nutrient solution rather than in soil.1 Typically, bubbles created by an air pump ensure that mineral nutrient salts are evenly distributed throughout the growth media. A root support system, or substrate, can be provided by a biologically and chemically inert, porous material such as mineral wool or perlite. Light is usually provided by LED lamps and temperatures are typically controlled by environmental regulation systems (Figure 1).

Schematic illustration of a hydroponic growing system that employs the nutrient film technique method, with the main components indicated.


Figure 1: Schematic illustration of a hydroponic growing system that employs the nutrient film technique method. Credit: Technology Networks.


A variety of techniques exist within the category of hydroponic systems; among the most common are the nutrient film technique (NFT) and deep-water culture (DWC) methods.6,7,8 NFT employs a pump system through which a shallow volume of water is transported into an elevated trough, as seen in Figure 1.6 Plants’ roots are supported in a substrate that is surrounded by a nutrient solution only a few centimeters in depth. Spent growing media is directed away from the plants via an outflow pipe that leads water back into a central reservoir. While NFT has numerous benefits, including greater oxygenation and root health, NFT systems are vulnerable to pump failure or flow-through problems.6,8,9 DWC systems, as seen in Figure 2, root plants on floating rafts or supports directly into the nutrient-rich media.6 While DWC is associated with relatively low setup and running costs, drawbacks can include a lack of system control and reduced potential for automation.

Schematic illustration of a hydroponic growing system that employs the DWC technique method, with the main components indicated.


Figure 2: Schematic illustration of a hydroponic growing system that employs the DWC technique method. Credit: Technology Networks.


Hydroponic plants

Many plant species can be grown hydroponically.1 However, hydroponic growing methods are most commonly used to produce edible fruits and vegetables that are suitable for human consumption due to the demands of the global food market. Hydroponic systems are also used in the cultivation of ornamental plants for the cut flower market.3


Hydroponic nutrients and pH conditions

Hydroponic nutrient solutions typically consist of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, calcium and sulfur all of which are essential to support plant growth.1,10 Solutions may also contain lower concentrations of plant micronutrients such as copper, boron, iron, manganese, molybdenum and zinc. These nutrients must be available not only in the correct amounts, but also in appropriate ratios to support plant growth.


The specific composition of any nutrient solution may closely affect its pH.1 In most hydroponic systems, a pH range between 5.56.5 is considered optimal and can be determined as a measure of electrical conductivity.11 Just as different plant species have different nutrient requirements; they also thrive in different pH conditions.12 Hence, it’s important that solutions are diluted accordingly and monitored regularly. As plants absorb nutrients from their aqueous environment, the pH of their growing media may change. Careful monitoring is required to ensure that solutions remain balanced and that pH conditions remain conducive to plant health.13,14


What is aquaponics?

Aquaponics is a subtype of hydroponic farming in which plants are grown in nutrient-rich aquaculture water rather than supplemented, sterile water.2 Biological waste produced by farmed fish or crustaceans is used as a nutrient supply for plants, which in turn purify the water in preparation for its recycling. Due to their closed-loop design and focus on resource economy, aquaponic systems are generally considered to be a sustainable option in the future of agriculture.2,15


The best fish for aquaponics systems

Several fish species can be farmed in aquaponic systems.16,17 By far the most commonly cultivated fish are tilapia species, however other species include catfish, perch, trout and bass. While tilapia and catfish remain popular amongst aquaponic food producers, they can be considered less desirable due to their status as invasive species.18 Hence, research into more sustainable aquaculture options is important to meet industry demands.18,19 


Aquaponic nutrition and environmental conditions

To ensure that aquaponic systems remain economically sustainable, fish stocks must be considered commercial crops in their own right.17 Choosing the right fish species cannot only enhance the revenue potential from fish stocks, but it can also optimize the yield of plant crops from aquaponic systems.20 Many aquaponic farms operate a controlled waste production strategy where fish stock diets are actively adjusted in order to manipulate nutrient accumulation and minimize the need for additional, costly supplementation.21


Complex and diverse microbial ecosystems also constitute an important part of the aquaponic environment.15 They are essential for:

  • Nitrification and denitrification
  • Organic matter decomposition
  • Phosphorus mineralization
  • Iron cycling


Nitrifying bacteria facilitate the conversion of aqueous ammonium – produced from the gills and excreta of fish – into nitrates, which can be absorbed easily by plant crops. As excess ammonium can be toxic to both fish and plant species, nitrifying bacteria are crucial to the success of aquaponic farming.


Key differences between hydroponics and aquaponics in system components and design

In addition to the presence of fish stocks and microbial communities, there are several key differences between hydroponic and aquaponic systems when it comes to their design. Many such differences relate to an increased need for filtration in aquaponic systems. While hydroponic systems are relatively simple in their structure, aquaponic farming requires additional system components.22 In aquaponic systems, water typically flows away from the aquaculture tank and into a sedimentation unit where solid waste can be removed. Supernatant water then flows into a biofilter – a porous material with a large surface area that is populated with nitrifying bacteria as shown in Figure 3. By including these additional elements in their system design, aquaponic systems ensure adequate conditions for all species while minimizing the need for human intervention.    

Schematic illustration of an aquaponic growing system that employs the nutrient film technique methods, with the main components indicated.


Figure 3: Schematic illustration of an aquaponic growing system that employs the nutrient film technique methods. Credit: Technology Networks.


As with hydroponics, aquaponics also utilizes both NFT and DWC techniques.23,24 Additional considerations in aquaponics systems include the balancing of pH requirements in DWC to accommodate both the fish and plants in close proximity. Of note, studies have shown that DWC techniques yield higher crop nutrient uptake than NFT in aquaponic systems.


The future of hydroponics and aquaponics

Hydroponic and aquaponic systems have been hailed as promising techniques in the future of food production.5 Sustainability, economical resource management and food cultivation in urban areas are all potential benefits of embracing soil-free systems. Additionally, it has been postulated that soil-free systems could play a vital role in ensuring food safety, adequate nutrition and even provide potential biopharmaceutical solutions in the not-too-distant future.25,26,27,28,29 Let’s consider some of these aspects in more detail.


Sustainability

Soil-free farming methods are generally considered to be important techniques in sustainable agriculture. Such methods promise opportunities to reduce agricultural land usage and to cultivate food in urban areas.30 However, skeptics highlight the energy consumption requirements of both aquaponic and hydroponic systems.31 While both consume significant electrical power in the form of lighting and atmospheric control, studies suggest that hydroponic farming is more energy efficient, and hence more sustainable, than equivalent greenhouse methods.32 Fertilizers and fish stock feed also account for significant energy and financial costs associated with soil-free farming.33 While aquaponics has been reported to be a sustainable means to reduce the use of nitrogen-rich fertilizers, some studies now suggest that these claims may have been overstated.


Food safety & nutrition

Soilless growing techniques have been associated with lower food safety risks, due to crops’ reduced exposure to environmental sources of contamination.25,26 However, the crossover of potentially pathogenic microbes can still occur through water splashing, improper hygiene and careless handling.34 On the whole, hydroponic and aquaponic systems represent an opportunity to improve food safety for both human consumption and farmed fish.35 Meanwhile, a reduced requirement for artificial pesticides could offer a potential benefit to health-conscious consumers.36,37,38


Hydroponic techniques have also been harnessed to explore the production of higher quality produce with greater nutrient and non-nutrient bioactive content.39, 40, 41 While most hydroponically and aquaponically grown foods are thought to be comparable in their nutrient profiles to their soil-grown counterparts, some studies have highlighted differences that may require further research.27,36


Vertical farming

Vertical farming is the practice of growing crops in stacked layers to achieve maximum yield per square meter.31 While vertical farming doesn’t always incorporate hydroponic or aquaponic techniques, both practices are commonly used to deliver nutrition to crops above ground level. Vertical farms using hydroponic and aquaponic systems have both proven successful.42,43 However, despite their early promise of success, vertical farms are not without their challenges.31 Many vertical farms rely heavily on LED lighting and expensive environmental control systems. As the costs of energy consumption continue to increase, questions have been raised regarding how vertical aquaponic farms may meet future demands.


Growing vaccines in plants

Aside from food production, hydroponic growing methods may also contribute to the future production of biotherapeutics.28,29 Commercial hydroponic systems have been successfully used to produce biotherapeutics on an industrial scale, and research has demonstrated the possibility of cultivating vaccine components in edible, hydroponically grown plants.28,44 Indoor, soil-free growing methods could make it possible to achieve faster commercial biotherapeutic production, free from contaminants.45


Hydroponics vs Aquaponics


The main differences in hydroponics compared to aquaponics (Figure 4) are summarized in the table below.

Simplified illustration of a hydroponics versus and aquaponics agricultural system.

Figure 4: Hydroponics versus aquaponics. Credit: Technology Networks.

 

Hydroponics

Aquaponics

Nutrient supply

Nutrients added directly into an aqueous growing media

 

Nutrients supplied in the form of aquaculture waste water

Main ongoing costs

Nutrient replenishment

Fish feed

Revenue source

Sale of plant crops

 

Sale of fish and plant crops

Microbial ecology

Mainly sterile

 

Requires the presence of diverse microbial communities 

System design

More simple

 

More complex

1.      Velazquez-Gonzalez RS, Garcia-Garcia AL, Ventura-Zapata E, et al. A review on hydroponics and the technologies associated for medium- and small-scale operations. Agriculture. 2022; 12(5):646. doi:10.3390/agriculture12050646

2.      Baganz GFMJunge RPortella MC, et al. The aquaponic principle — it is all about couplingRev Aquac2021;14:252264. doi:10.1111/raq.12596

3.      Kaushal S, Kumari P. Growing media in floriculture crops. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9(2):1056–1061. https://www.phytojournal.com/archives/2020/vol9issue2/PartR/9-1-381-914.pdf. Accessed December 11, 2023.

4.      Pineda-Pineda J, Miranda-Velázquez I, Ramírez-Arias JA, et al. Culture of lily (Lilium sp.) 'Table Dance' in an aquaponic system. Acta Hortic. 2018;1227:355–364. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1227.44

5.      Hemathilake DMKS, Gunathilake DMCC. High-productive agricultural technologies to fulfill future food demands: Hydroponics, aquaponics, and precision/smart agriculture. In: Bhat R, eds. Future Foods. Academic Press. 2022:555567. doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-91001-9.00018-9

6.      Gillani SA, Abbasi R, Martinez P, Ahmad R. Comparison of energy-use efficiency for lettuce plantation under nutrient film technique and deep-water culture hydroponic systems. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2023;217:1119. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.197

7.      Mohammed S. Introduction to nutrient film technique. Tomorrow's Agriculture. SpringerBriefs in Plant Science, Springer Cham. 2018:711. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-99202-0_2

8.      Griffith M, Buss G, Carroll P, et al. The comparative performance of nutrient-film technique and deep-water culture method of hydroponics for GREENBOX technology. Agric. Sci. 2023;14:1108–1120. doi:10.4236/as.2023.148074

9.      Schmautz Z, Loeu F, Liebisch F, et al. Tomato productivity and quality in aquaponics: comparison of three hydroponic methods. Water. 2016;8(11):533. doi:10.3390/w8110533

10.   Kane CDJasoni RL, Peffley EP, et al. Nutrient solution and solution pH influences on onion growth and mineral content, J. Plant Nutr. 2006;29(2),375390.  doi:10.1080/01904160500477028

11.   Fakhrurroja H, Mardhotillah SA, Mahendra O, et al. Automatic pH and humidity control system for hydroponics using fuzzy logic. Paper presented at: 2019 International Conference on Computer, Control, Informatics and its Applications (IC3INA). 2019; Tangerang, Indonesia. doi:10.1109/IC3INA48034.2019.8949590

12.   Fimbres-Acedo YE, Traversari S, Cacini S, et al. Testing the effect of high pH and low nutrient concentration on four leafy vegetables in hydroponics. Agronomy. 2023;13(1):41. doi:10.3390/agronomy13010041

13.   Cho WJ, Kim HJ, Jung DH, et al. On-site ion monitoring system for precision hydroponic nutrient management, Comput. Electron. Agric, 2018;5158. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2018.01.019

14.   Mirtalebi M, Banihashemi Z. Effect of salinity on root rot of Cucumis melo L. caused by Phytophthora melonis. JAST. 2019;21(1):209–220. http://jast.modares.ac.ir/article-23-15220-en.html. Accessed December 11, 2023.

15.   Kasozi N, Abraham B, Kaiser H, et al. The complex microbiome in aquaponics: significance of the bacterial ecosystem. Ann Microbiol. 2021;71(1). doi:10.1186/s13213-020-01613-5

16.   Love DC, Fry JP, Genello L, et al. An international survey of aquaponics practitioners. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(7):e102662. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102662

17.   Masabni J, Chesser B, Sink T. Aquaponics: fish species selection. Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service, Texas A&M University. https://fisheries.tamu.edu/files/2020/12/EHT-148-fish-selection-in-aquaponics.pdf. Accessed December 11, 2023.

18.   Pinho SM, David LH, Garcia F, et al. South American fish species suitable for aquaponics: a review. Aquacult Int. 2021;29,1427–1449. doi:10.1007/s10499-021-00674-w

19.   Bich TTN, Yi-Ching C, Tri DQ, Dang KH. Applied aquaponics to culture high value local species and ultimately reused and recycle the local materials to build the green and sustainable agriculture. Paper presented at: 2019 International Conference on Resources and Environmental Research. October 25–27, 2019; Qingdao, China. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/432/1/012008

20.   Knaus U, Palm HW. Effects of the fish species choice on vegetables in aquaponics under spring-summer conditions in northern Germany (Mecklenburg Western Pomerania). Aquaculture. 2017;6273. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.01.020

21.   Robaina L, Pirhonen J, Mente E, Sánchez J, Goosen N. Fish diets in aquaponics. In: Goddek S, Joyce A, Kotzen B, Burnell GM, eds. Aquaponics Food Production Systems. Springer. 2019:333–352. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-15943-6_13

22.   Palm HW, Knaus U, Appelbaum S, Strauch SM, Kotzen B. Coupled aquaponics systems. In: Goddek S, Joyce A, Kotzen B, Burnell GM, eds. Aquaponics Food Production Systems. Springer. 2019:163–199. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-15943-6_7

23.   Suhl J, Oppedijk B, Baganz D, et al. Oxygen consumption in recirculating nutrient film technique in aquaponics. Sci. Hortic. 2019;255:281–291. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2019.05.033

24.   Gosh K, Chowdhury S. Review of aquaponics system: searching for a technically feasible and economically profitable aquaponics system. J. Agric. Sci. Environ. 2019;19:5–13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332537786. Accessed December 11, 2023.

25.   Mengyi D, Hao F. Microbial community analysis and food safety practice survey-based hazard identification and risk assessment for controlled environment hydroponic/aquaponic farming systems. Front Microbiol. 2022;13. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.879260    

26.   Wang YJ, Deering AJ, Kim H-J. The occurrence of shiga toxin-producing E. coli in aquaponic and hydroponic systems. Horticulturae. 2020;6(1):1. doi:10.3390/horticulturae6010001

27.   Braglia R, Costa P, Di Marco G. et al. Phytochemicals and quality level of food plants grown in an aquaponics system. J Sci Food Agric. 2020;102:844–850. doi:10.1002/jsfa.11420

28.   Matsuda R, Kubota C, Alvarez ML, Cardineau GA. Biopharmaceutical protein production under controlled environments: growth, development, and vaccine productivity of transgenic tomato plants grown hydroponically in a greenhouse. HortScience. 2009;44(6):1594–1599. doi:10.21273/HORTSCI.44.6.1594

29.   Wirz H, Sauer-Budge AF, Briggs J, Sharpe A, Shu S, Sharon A. Automated production of plant-based vaccines and pharmaceuticals. J. Lab. Autom. 2012;17(6):449–457. doi:10.1177/2211068212460037

30.   Diehl JA, Sweeney E, Wong B, Sia CS, Yao H, Prabhudesai M. Feeding cities: Singapore's approach to land use planning for urban agriculture. Glob. Food Sec. 2020;26:100377. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100377

31.   Van Gerrewey T, Boon N, Geelen D. Vertical farming: The only way is up? Agronomy. 2022; 12(1):2. doi:10.3390/agronomy12010002

32.   Graamans L, Baeza E, van den Dobbelsteen A, Tsafaras I, Stanghellini C. Plant factories versus greenhouses: Comparison of resource use efficiency. Agric. Syst. 2018;160:3143. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2017.11.003

33.   Colt J, Schuur AM. Comparison of nutrient costs from fish feeds and inorganic fertilizers for aquaponics systems. Aquacult. Eng. 2021;95:102205. doi:10.1016/j.aquaeng.2021.102205

34.   Sawyer T. Food safety and E. coli in aquaponic and hydroponic systems. Horticulturae. 2021; 7(3):36. doi:10.3390/horticulturae7030036

35.   Hoevenaars K, Junge R, Bardocz T, Leskovec M. EU policies: New opportunities for aquaponics. Ecocycles. 2018;4(1):10–15. doi:10.19040/ecocycles.v4i1.87

36.   Treftz C, Omaye S. Comparison between hydroponic and soil systems for growing strawberries in a greenhouse. J. Agric. Ext. 2016;3(3):195–200. https://journals.esciencepress.net/index.php/IJAE/article/view/1236. Accessed December 11, 2023.

37.   Fu TT, Liu JT, Hammitt JK. Consumer willingness to pay for low-pesticide fresh produce in Taiwan. J Agri Econ. 1999;50(2):220–233. doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.1999.tb00809.x

38.   Pomoni DI, Koukou MK, Vrachopoulos MG, Vasiliadis L. A Review of hydroponics and conventional agriculture based on energy and water consumption, environmental impact, and land use. Energies. 2023;16(4):1690. doi:10.3390/en16041690

39.   Buchanan D, Omaye S. Comparative study of ascorbic acid and tocopherol concentrations in hydroponic- and soil-grown lettuces, Food Sci. Nutr. 2013;4(10):1047-1053. doi:10.4236/fns.2013.410136

40.   Xavier J, Azevedo C, Azevedo M et al. Evaluation of vitamin C, nitrate and chlorophyll content determined in lettuce (Thaís, Vanda, Verônica) cultivated in hydroponic system using wastewater. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2019;13(06):934-943. doi:10.21475/ajcs.19.13.06.p1682.

41.   Lei C, Engeseth NJ. Comparison of growth characteristics, functional qualities, and texture of hydroponically grown and soil-grown lettuce. LWT. 2021;150:111931. doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111931

42.   Touliatos D, Dodd IC, McAinsh M. Vertical farming increases lettuce yield per unit area compared to conventional horizontal hydroponics. Food Energy Secur. 2016;5(3): 184191. doi:10.1002/fes3.83

43.   David LH, Pinho SM, Agostinho F, et al. Sustainability of urban aquaponics farms: An emergy point of view, J. Clean. Prod. 2022;331: 129896. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129896.

44.   Matsui T, Takita E, Oiwa S, et al. Lettuce-based production of an oral vaccine against porcine edema disease for the seed lot system, Plant Biotechnol. J. 2021;38(2): 239-246. doi:10.5511/plantbiotechnology.21.0414a.

45.   Moon KB, Park JS, Park YI, et al. Development of systems for the production of plant-derived biopharmaceuticals. Plants. 2020; 9(1):30. doi:10.3390/plants9010030